Description

In this week's episode, Jono questioned the non-naming of racing minors, which was clarified to be due to laws protecting under-18s in criminal proceedings. Concerns were raised about a blogger's social media posts risking contempt of court by influencing a trial, leading to a discussion on preventing prejudice in legal cases. The Supreme Court's decision to overturn a liquor commission penalty against a Kimberley pub was highlighted due to a decision-maker's absence and disproportionate fine. Rose sought advice on filing witness statements for civil claims, including using Nick’s AI software for efficiency. Phil inquired about a real estate agent taking commission for a recovered debt they didn't pursue, leading to discussion on unfair contract terms. Finally, Katie asked about the enforceability of a 50km restraint of trade clause in a daycare contract, and an opinion was shared on the leniency of community sentencing.

Topics Discussed:

Naming restrictions for minors

Contempt of court via social media

Overturning liquor commission penalty

Witness statement filing

Real estate agent commission dispute

Enforceability of restraint of trade

Leniency of community sentencing