Description

In this week's episode, Dave inquired about disputing child support assessments, and Nick advised formal reviews through Services Australia or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, emphasising evidence gathering. Dylan's public pool injury raised questions about operator duty of care and the Civil Liabilities Act's impact on pain and suffering claims, with Nick highlighting a high monetary threshold for compensation. Marie sought advice on a car service center's misleading quote, and Nick suggested reviewing contract terms or pursuing a consumer protection claim. Anthony discussed responsibility for a damaged reticulation system, and Nick recommended contacting the strata company first. Veronica sought legal guidance on an opaque property option agreement, with Nick strongly advising a property lawyer. Robert queried a workers' compensation settlement offer, and Nick urged consultation with a workers' compensation lawyer before signing. Finally, Martin provided clarity on car service schedules, explaining the importance of time-based maintenance alongside mileage.

Topics Discussed:

Child support assessment disputes

Public pool injury liability

Misleading car service quotes

Reticulation system damage responsibility

Property option agreement review

Workers compensation settlement advice

Car service schedule explanations