What happens at a Fair Work Commission conciliation
- Type
- Guide
- Topic
- Termination of Employment
- First published
- 31 July 2017

Most unfair dismissal and general protections dismissal claims start with a conciliation: a confidential, informal conference run by the Fair Work Commission to see whether the dispute can be settled. This guide explains the rules, how the conference runs, what happens if it does not settle, and what a settlement usually contains.
Key points
- Conciliation is a negotiation, not a trial: nobody gives evidence and nobody is found right or wrong.
- What is said is confidential, and the conference must not be recorded.
- If an unfair dismissal claim does not settle, it goes to a Commission member for a conference or hearing that decides it; a general protections dismissal claim needs a certificate and then a court application, or consent to arbitration.
- A settlement is usually written up as terms of settlement or a deed, and the claim is then discontinued.
What conciliation is
When you lodge an unfair dismissal application (s 394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)) or a general protections application about a dismissal (s 365), the usual first step is a conciliation. A conciliation is a private conference in which an independent conciliator helps you and your former employer try to agree on a way to end the dispute.
It is usually held by telephone or video, and normally lasts a few hours at most. You attend, as does someone for the employer, along with any lawyers or other representatives each side has. The conciliator does not decide who is right and cannot make orders about the merits of the claim.
For a general protections dismissal claim the Commission must deal with the dispute, which in practice means a conference (s 368). Since 7 July 2026 the Commission does not need to decide first whether you were in fact dismissed: an alleged dismissal is enough at this stage. For a general protections dispute that does not involve a dismissal, the Commission can hold a conference only if both sides agree.
The ground rules
At the start, the conciliator explains how the conference will run and the rules that apply. The main ones are these.
(a) Confidentiality. What is said in the conference stays within it, and the parties are asked not to repeat it to others.
(b) Settlement talk. The discussion is a negotiation aimed at settling the claim. Offers and concessions made in it are generally not available to be used as evidence if the matter later goes to a hearing.
(c) No recording. Recording the conference on a phone or any other device is not allowed.
(d) Courtesy. Everyone is expected to listen and not talk over one another.
How the conference runs
The conciliator opens by setting out the rules. Each side then briefly explains its position, usually starting with the worker who brought the claim. This part is short: it is a chance to be heard and to understand the other side's view, not to argue the case in full.
The conciliator then speaks to each side separately in private sessions. Offers are made and carried back and forth by the conciliator until the parties either agree or it is clear they will not. The conciliator may also give a frank view of the risks each side faces, which can help both sides be realistic.
It helps to prepare: know what you want (money, a reference, a resignation instead of a dismissal on your record), what you would accept, and what you have lost in pay since the dismissal.
If it does not settle
An unfair dismissal claim that does not settle is listed before a member of the Commission, who decides it after a conference or a hearing (ss 397–399). Any objection the employer raises about whether you can claim at all, such as the minimum employment period or the high income threshold, may be dealt with first.
A general protections dismissal claim works differently. If the Commission is satisfied that all reasonable attempts to resolve it have failed, it issues a certificate (s 368(3)). You can then apply to the Federal Court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) within 14 days of the certificate (s 370). Alternatively, if both sides agree, the Commission can arbitrate the dispute (s 369). A court will often send the parties to mediation before any trial.
What a settlement can include
If you reach agreement, it is written up in terms of settlement or a deed of settlement, which is a binding contract. You then discontinue your claim with the Commission. Common terms include:
(a) a payment to you, and how it will be treated for tax;
(b) your dismissal being recorded as a resignation, where that is agreed;
(c) a statement of service or an agreed reference;
(d) confidentiality, and an agreement by each side not to make disparaging remarks about the other; and
(e) a release, under which you agree not to bring further claims about your employment.
Read every term before signing: a release can stop you making other claims you may have, such as an underpayment claim. Remember too that an unfair dismissal or general protections dismissal application must be lodged within 21 days of the dismissal, so it is worth getting advice early.
The takeaway
Conciliation is your best early chance to settle a dismissal claim on your own terms. Go in knowing what you want and what you would accept, and read the settlement terms carefully before you sign.
Note: First published in 2017 and rewritten in October 2026. The old article said a general protections claim that does not settle goes to mediation at the Federal Circuit Court; in fact the Commission issues a certificate, and the worker may apply to the Federal Court or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2, which replaced the Federal Circuit Court on 1 September 2021) within 14 days, or both sides may agree to Commission arbitration. Conferences are now often held by video as well as telephone. The general protections change from 7 July 2026 (Act No. 62, 2026: an alleged dismissal is enough at the Commission stage) is noted.
General information about the law as it stands, not legal advice. Every situation turns on its own facts. First published 31 July 2017; updated 21 October 2026.
Does this sound like your situation?
More case studies

Fair Work Commission · 18 July 2017
Sacked over an early book delivery and a bullying claim nobody proved
Biffin v XL Express Pty Ltd
A depot manager with 24 years at a freight company was dismissed on the spot over an embargoed book delivered a day early and an allegation that he was a bully. The Fair Work Commission found the bullying claim rested on hearsay, the delivery mistake did not justify dismissal, and he was never given a chance to respond. It ordered $48,432.69 in compensation.
$48,432.69 compensation plus superannuationTermination#unfair dismissal#procedural fairness#investigations
Read the case study
Fair Work Commission · 9 August 2017
A pilot filed the wrong dismissal claim on advice, and got a second chance
Michael Edwards v Tiger Airways Australia Pty Ltd T/A Tigerair
Tigerair made pilot Michael Edwards redundant. The adviser he went to lodged an unfair dismissal claim on time, but it was the wrong kind of claim for a high earner who had already received a large termination payment. When he lodged the right claim, a general protections application, it was 29 days late. The Fair Work Commission found the delay was the adviser's error, not his, and gave him the extra time.
Extension of time granted; claim can proceedTermination#general protections#unfair dismissal#time limits
Read the case study
Fair Work Commission · 14 July 2017
Cleaner sacked by phone four days before her doctor cleared her
Veronica Bennett v Colin Joss & Co Pty Limited T/A Joss Facility Management
A part-time cleaner recovering from foot and ankle surgery told her employer she would see her doctor on 10 February 2017. Four days before that appointment, the employer decided during a phone call that she could no longer do her job and dismissed her on the spot. Her doctor cleared her to return to work. The Fair Work Commission found there was no valid reason and no fair process, and ordered her reinstatement with lost pay.
Reinstated, with lost payTermination#unfair dismissal#procedural fairness#reinstatement
Read the case study